The short answer to the question can science prove life after death is—YES. The problem is not about designing objective and replicable clinical tests or even inventing machines sensitive enough to register organized consciousness outside of matter. All that would be easy in comparison to something like the Hadron Collider built to discover how matter forms at a subatomic level. The collider is a subterranean machine 17 miles (27 km) in length running under the Swiss-French border. Its development is a joint effort of European nations (CERN) and its data are sent to some 160 universities throughout the world for analysis. Nor is the problem about cost. The price tag for the Hadron Collider is already well into billions of euros. Compare this high-level, international government and university sponsored coordination and mind-boggling expense for the Hadron Collider to the small-scale, uncoordinated investigation of life after death, an enterprise which is nearly always conducted privately, and without outside funding. As science routinely invents devices that can “see” the invisible, whether in astrophysics or nuclear physics, why can’t it develop the technology it takes to prove life after death?
The problem is attitude. A Gallup poll on immortality found that only 16% of leading scientists believed in life after death as opposed to anywhere from 67% to 82% of the general population, according to several polls combined. And only 4% of these scientists thought it might be possible for science to prove it. Apparently they have no trouble believing in Multiverses in which a nearly infinite number of parallel universes are imperceptible or String Theory with its 11 dimensions of reality, some of them also imperceptible, and the Hidden Worlds Theory, which again hypothesizes imperceptible universes. But an afterlife? That’s just too crazy. Although this poll dates back to 1982 and so far newer ones have not been taken, the scorn and ridicule targeted at scientists who might be brave enough to propose testing for an afterlife and the subsequent loss or demotion of their professional positions are costs too high to risk. Even so, funding to test a survival hypothesis would hardly be granted.
So far evidence for survival is coming from the softer sciences, psychiatry, psychology as well as medicine and biology, with specific, potentially revolutionary hints in neurobiology, quantum biology and genetics. Even in the softer sciences, however, a person chances considerable derision if not loss of professional reputation for pursuing research in this area. Ironically, the hard sciences are doing the most to dismantle the assumption that the material universe is the only real universe—a crucial point for any argument for a non-material dimension of the dead. Astrophysics claims that 95.4% of the entire universe is not made up of the kind of matter and energy we call “real.” Less than a third of the 95.4% is composed instead of a mysterious substance called dark matter and more than 2/3rds of it is equally strange dark energy. The universe we are accustomed to thinking of as real amounts to a mere 4.6% and is composed of the kind of matter and energy we know. But quantum mechanics describes the matter that makes up our world, our bodies, and the computer in front of you as barely physical at all. In fact, the ratio of the amount of matter in an atom to the total size of an atom is roughly that of a pea to a football field. The rest is energy in the form of forces and oscillations. If you took all the space out of the atoms making up the human body, the amount of solid matter left would be the size of a microscopic dot. Theoretically then, what separates us from discarnates is that dot.
Most of us believe that the hard sciences, such as physics and chemistry, conduct the most objective and most accurate tests in comparison to the softer sciences. But any particle physicist knows that there is no such thing as objectivity. We also assume that the hard sciences’ test results are more precisely measured and more consistent than those of other sciences. If you really look closely at how scientific proof is achieved, you may be astonished to find that solid proof is not so solid. Dean Radin, senior scientist for The Institute of Noetic Science, gives many examples in his book, The Conscious Universe. One study he looks at was conducted by Larry Hedge of the University of Chicago. Hedge’s analysis compared the empirical replication rate for particle physics—the hardest of the hard sciences—with the empirical success in replication for social sciences. Both particle physics and social sciences showed a statistical inconsistency of 45%, that is, when all studies were taken into account. For reasons of design flaws or flukes, particle physicists discarded tests whose results were incompatible with expected ones. Since we now know that soft-science experiments can be as successfully replicated as those in hard sciences, we can assume that there is a potential design for replicable clinical tests on the continuation of organized consciousness outside of matter. I also suspect that the electrical energy of the dead—an energy my own body registers so strongly—could be precisely measured, which would yield quantifiable results. The technology sensitive enough to do so already exists.
Much of what the hard sciences propose as real is more often extrapolation from a set of effects rather than fact. If this and that are observed to happen, why they happen is deduced. From these deductions, a workable hypothesis is formed and then tested. We don’t really know, for instance, if there was ever a Big Bang. There has been no direct observation of this proposed cosmic event. That’s why the Hadron Collider was built, to attempt reproduction of how matter was born. The assumptions of a Big Bang or even a black hole are derived from a set of discernible conditions that can best be explained—in the current state of our knowledge—by a bang or a hole.
The evidence for survival already available satisfies the scientific criteria required for testing. First, there is a phenomenon in which it can be definitely stated that something real has happened because of its effects. That phenomenon could be anything from a recorded voice with no known source, a picture of a deceased individual picked up on film or a visitation from the deceased witnessed by more than one person simultaneously. Second, a very finite number of hypothetical causes from these effects can be extrapolated. And third, the hypothesis that best and most elegantly explains all the observable effects of a given phenomenon is the existence of organized consciousness outside the realm of matter. The problem of replicating these effects under clinical conditions remains however. If the dead could be induced to participate, and they can be, we could test for other more quantifiable effects, especially in the electromagnetic range. Another obvious route would be the development of sensitive communication technology. The private sector that researches Instrumental Transcommunication, as it is called, has already made remarkable progress, sometimes with startling success. If only 1% of the money and expertise that went into the Hadron Collider were available (even better, 1% of the ten trillion spent on developing the atomic bomb), within a matter of a few years science could prove life after death.
128 Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Joe Salmons
2014-05-28 @ 7:13 PM
I have not witnessed someone die up close, but my father died when I was 16 and about a week or so later he visited me, like in so many other stories. This was the one and only time he visited me in physical form. He did not speak but we could read each other’s thoughts. He told me he was happy and it was beautiful and there was nothing to fear.
Sometimes I have my doubts whether it was real, but unlike dreams, this one never faded and still seems real.
Julia
2014-06-04 @ 5:00 AM
Terrific Joe. The vividness does not fade! IT WAS NOT A DREAM.
jimmy jhonson
2014-05-29 @ 12:03 AM
Almost all the religions support life after death , which makes more strong sense , Rather then those rich scientists who are really happy with this existing life and don”t want to research more on this stuff .
Julia
2014-06-04 @ 4:58 AM
That’s an interesting response. Very few scientists are rich, by the way. Still there is no money available to research life after death. One good reason for scientists to stay away from it. And they could lose their jobs if interested in proving life after death. It’s okay for them to have religious beliefs about survival, but not scientific ideas about survival. Rather than rich and happy being the reason, I would say fear and immaturity!
Rachael
2014-05-29 @ 2:30 AM
Hey Julia, I have a cat right now who has gotten hypertrophic cartiomyopathy and I am fearful about how she is and if she has a soul and we will meet when I die. I do sometimes become very fearful of no life after death, and it is hard on me, I found out what happened to her today. I sometimes think “what if there is no life after this?” it makes me very fearful.
If you see spirits literally, do you ever see animal spirits like dogs, cats, rabbits and horses and so on? I would love to have a full conversation with you in answering all my enquires.
Julia
2014-06-20 @ 5:04 AM
Rachael, I constantly see animals in the afterlife, often animals a person had in childhood. And 10% of all visitations from the other side are animals, just less than grandparents and far more than spouses! Animals, like us human animals, survive! Believe it.
Paulene Grey
2014-06-04 @ 8:34 PM
Just simply `thank you` for sharing this. I have believed for the last 20 years and I so very much wish the matter could be investigated further now without it being ridiculed. In a hundred or so years time, it will not be a subject that will be frowned upon, it will be accepted, investigated and talked about more openly .
Julia
2014-06-04 @ 9:01 PM
I am hoping it will be second nature!
gbear
2014-06-11 @ 12:24 AM
I worked at two Los Angeles hospitals in my younger days/daze. I was in a patient’s room along with four other staff members watching a elder woman take her last breath. When that last breath was taken,& a few moments passed,I witnessed a small cloudy substance exit the crown area of her head.It hovered there for a moment,then ‘wisped’ away. There was a profound stillness in the room.I looked over at the other’s present & saw them staring wide eyed & mouths open as a result of the same incident I had witnessed.I commented to them,”did you see what I just saw”. Their faces turned to me & I then saw fear & shock come over them as if I had spoken the unspeakable.They immediately left the room & never spoke about the incident, ever after, which I considered a gift. Why a gift? Previous to this & upon graduating from high school,I taught myself to meditate.My first attempt caused me to leave my body through a tunnel towards a very bright & wonderful light.I ‘thought’,felt,”this is home”.I did not want to return,however,the more I tried to stay,the more I ‘descended’ back down the tunnel & finally into my body.As is said in Spanish,”que lastima”,which means,”such a tear”. The year was 1969 & I had no info regards NDE,life after death,etc. to influence my experiences.I also remember when my father was dying,he was crossing back & forth to the ‘other side’ as if preparing for the journey which he verbally confirmed in moments of returning consciousness.There is a old book written & titled, “whereever you go,there you are”. I believe this true of ‘our’ spirit.
Julia
2014-06-11 @ 1:01 AM
I just love this comment!
Frankly, it is quite easy to see the energy body leave at the moment the body expires. In fact, I teach people how to do that. It is really only a matter of focus. Now this witnessing has a name, “shared death experience.” Too bad the others in the room had such adverse reactions. Dying and death are full of the miraculous!
sheriif
2014-06-25 @ 1:16 PM
There is no death, it’s all about ur imaginations, if u can control ur dream,u can do anything after death xD consciousness is the light;;(
Rita
2014-06-25 @ 12:58 AM
I also saw wisps of smoke leaving my mothers head when she died. It happened right when the hospice nurse told us that she had passed away. Before that happened though I saw the bed she was lying in begin to glow in white. I also saw a dark “cord” that went from her chest up to the corner of the room. It was almost like a dark cloudy thing. Shortly after that (a few hours) she died.
I really liked the way you described the room as being profoundly still. I’ve never been able to describe what the room was like at that time, but that would be a pretty good description. Not a perfect description though. It was one of those indescribable experiences.
One other really eerie thing that happened. I was alone in the room with her, sitting next to her bed the day before she passed away. She was in a coma, and I was just sitting there watching her breathe. I felt a presence behind me, and someone put their hand on the side of my face, as if to comfort me. I thought it was one of my sisters, or perhaps the hospice nurse. But when I turned to see who it was, there was nobody there. This was not imagined, not some vague occurrence. It was so real that it made me turn to see who it was.
My mom’s passing was one of the most profound spiritual experiences I’ve ever had. And I still every once in a while search for others on the internet who’ve posted similar experiences, just to validate the experience for me. Otherwise, I find myself saying “Did that really happen?” I figure if there are others out there who report very similar experiences, then yes I know that it really did happen.
Julia
2014-06-26 @ 4:19 AM
Thank you so much for writing you shared death experience and what it meant to you. When you write about feeling someone behind you and there was no there, it makes me smile. Of course there were someone there, as you well know.